LC
Years ago

FIBA considering lowering rings for Women

Basketball's world governing body FIBA have announced that they are going to take a "serious look at lowering the rim for women's basketball."

This decision to look into the lowering of the rims follows a FIBA conference on women's basketball attended by coaches, players and officials during the women's WC's this past weekend, discussing ways improving the game and making it more appealing to a wider audience.

FIBA Link: http://linky.com.au/morc5

FIBA Secretary General and IOC member Patrick Baumann had this to say in the article:

"We have the smaller ball and now it's time to lower the rim. It will be tested."

"They will select certain countries and competition where they can test it. The question is, what will come out of the tests."

"The game as it is is a good game, but we have a large majority of women's basketball players that don't have that size and there are questions whether the game is as attractive as it really could be if you were able to play over the basket rather than under the basket."

Interesting...I have never really given the idea any thought. One thing that immediately comes to mind is the lack of equality, and with it the potential increase in costs for venues etc? What happens in schoolgrounds etc?

I don't think I'm a fan of the idea...stick with the smaller ball size.

Love to hear some other thoughts...

Topic #23945 | Report this topic


Anonymous  
Years ago

Wow! Why wouldnt they lower the ring for kids too then? This would have a massive impact on the game and I cant see how it would increase the appeal for women.

Reply #291017 | Report this post


just home  
Years ago

i like the idea and certainly worth a trial.

the appeal is more baskets

the logistics will be huge - but rememeber it is a FIBA initiative - how many school / social courts are correct FIBA dimensions anyway.

very good comment re juniors -

u10/12 rings a certain height

u14/16s modified height

u18s new womens height

are my thoughts on adjustments for juior ring heights

I like it and hope we trial it here

Reply #291022 | Report this post


Ushiro  
Years ago

Back in the olden days, the rings were at 8 foot 6 inches for under 12s boys. Cannot remember what age group girls used the lower height. I guess it got too hard to have sets of rings that could be adjusted to the two heights.

Reply #291035 | Report this post


Flinders80  
Years ago

Cambridge and Jackson throwing dunks down. I would watch that. Low post move turns into a Shaq attack

Reply #291038 | Report this post


Hems  
Years ago

That would get really confusing in mixed social basketball... :)

Reply #291045 | Report this post


Anonymous  
Years ago

an absolute nightmare at tournaments tho..

i say it's bullshit....

Reply #291049 | Report this post


DJ  
Years ago

Women dunking/the ability for more to dunk would change their game alot, however as mentioned equality will certainly prevail.

Mixed bball will most certainly be interesting!

Reply #291051 | Report this post


Do they need to be the same. At an elite level, mens game is played above the ring and womens are played below. Two different games but in my mind equally enjoyable for different reasons. I actually enjoy the guile or cunning involved as women "think" their way through traffic as apposed to a male with hops who gets away with "less ability?" by simply jumping over obstacles. That said, I enjoy watching one getting slammed down as much as the next person. I'm simply suggesting that while they are different games, they both have merit. In fact, as an A grade mens coach I often encouraged my less athletic players (ie the 80-90 % who cant dunk) to watch the women and learn how to get the job done without living above the ring. Might be showing my age but the poetic slow motion drive to the basket of Michelle Brogan was a joy to behold and I must admit that as age and gravity caught up with me I had her to thank for prolonging my career!! On the other hand i have a 15 year old daughter who can baby dunk who I am tipping will not share my views on this!

Reply #291055 | Report this post


Anonymous  
Years ago

What a joke!

Another FIBA sellout.

Just keep changing the rules hoping to attract more fans, and in the process the true basketball purist walk away from the game.

If the ring gets lowered I for one will never watch another women's basketball game again.

Reply #291057 | Report this post


Ineedmore  
Years ago

They should do it. As far keeping on changing the rules that's all that's happened for the past..well forever. New Keyways, three point lines, shot clocks, charging rules etc the list is endless.
If you don't evolve you get left behind.
If it sucks then revert.

Reply #291058 | Report this post


Anonymous  
Years ago

Yeah changing the rules and allowing improved swimsuits to make the races faster really worked for swimming too.

Oh and how about that possession arrow, great idea.

Sometimes things are fine as they are.

Reply #291065 | Report this post


Anon  
Years ago

This must be a joke? More appealing - bring back the lycra suits or bikinis, that will do it!!

Reply #291068 | Report this post


HO  
Years ago

Hey anon, some of us think the possession arrow is a good idea. some change make the game better some make it worse. I agree with the no charge, not fussed on the extended 3 point line.

And prisoner of gravity your description of Brogan is pretty much how I recall her - spot on!

Reply #291076 | Report this post


JCK  
Years ago

Did anyone know that Women's professional game is the same as Under 14s boys in that the ball size is the same and same foul line. Now FIBA are thinking of making the rim lower than Under 12s which is the same as at professional level.

Reply #291084 | Report this post


Anonymous  
Years ago

What a joke!!! Next there will be some score awarded for missing like the AFL!!!

I also think its insulting to women that can actually play.

Reply #291098 | Report this post


billo  
Years ago

It's not so much the act of dunking the ball through the hoop that makes it impressive, it's more the hang time and the hops to get up there people like to watch. Lowering the ring for the womens game might lead to more dunks but IMO it would be like watching youtube videos of 14 year olds dunking on 8 foot rings set up on the street.

Reply #291102 | Report this post


pete  
Years ago

I'm disgusted

Reply #291106 | Report this post


pwned  
Years ago

women cant jump anyway, this wont make any difference

Reply #291115 | Report this post


Juror 12  
Years ago

Is it April 1 somewhere in the world?

Reply #291131 | Report this post


Anonymous  
Years ago

This is just plain insulting to every single woman on the planet.

Reply #291135 | Report this post


SRT070  
Years ago

Before people get out of hand use a bit of common sense. they are trying to make the game more entertaining. And im not a sexist but some people take these things far to literally. there are some things that women on average cant do compared to men, and im talking specifically on average! yes there are weight lifting women that can lift more than the average man. But the way some people are jumping on this makes it sound like the olypmics are sexist because we have men and women categories. its just plain and simple women can do things that men can do and they can do things men cant do, in saying that there are things men can do that women cant to. if you look at olympic records there are alot more held by men than women, its not sexist its just how it is. and i am on FIBA's side in this one i think it would be more entertaining.

i dont see how its so insulting when FIBA consulted with coaches, players and officials whom have obviously raised the issue. so some people i think personally need to grow up and stop seeing things in black and white, its more insulting the human race to do so and this is the reason this country is becoming over politically correct about bloody everything.

thats my 2 cents worth, awaiting grilling!

Reply #291145 | Report this post


Anonymous  
Years ago

Why not raise the hoop for men. That would make the men play "below the ring", like the women.

Oh I've got an idea. Let's make it like weight lifting, boxing, wrestling and such sports. Only, instead of having weight divisions, we'll have height divisions. Then set the rings to different heights for different divisions.

Then short people can identify with the sport better and it will become more appealing to a wider audience. If that's all the sport is about, then go for it.

What a laugh professionalism and the advent of mass marketing has made of (some) sports.

Reply #291151 | Report this post


Ineedmore  
Years ago

If some bloke didn't have the guts to experiment and nail a couple of peach baskets to a wall where would we be.

Reply #291160 | Report this post


SRT070  
Years ago

anon, your argument is way out of proportion. not only that why raise the hoop for men to make them play under? the women are doing this and we have found it not entertaining, so why would we want to lessen the entertainment in the male league?

Reply #291174 | Report this post


SRT070  
Years ago

all im trying to say is, the women in the sport arent crying out saying its outrageous, if they think it will improve the quality of basketball and make it more entertaining then so be it, im all for it. it seems to be people that arent the ones playing in the womens shoes making this out to be a sexist attack.

Reply #291176 | Report this post


Laurie  
Years ago

I would like to see our Aussie Male mens netball team wear skirts

Reply #291179 | Report this post


Some food for thought.
1) The other game that i can think of that fosters height and jumping ability is Volleyball (spiking, blocking etc.) Men and women play with different net heights! The women's net height is 7.5 inches lower than the mens. I'm sure there are lots of readers who have never watched this sport but of the ones that have, how many can honestly say they thought the height of the net influenced how much you enjoyed the spectacle (or for that matter even realised that the net was lower during the womens game.) I am on record as saying I dont really support the change of height but if it goes ahead I wont lose sleep about it.
2) As expected, when I told my daughter they were contemplating lowering the rings I could see visions of Le bron and Michael flashing before her eyes and then the most telling comment, "hang on, I've just mastered shooting at a ten foot ring. What are the chances of them leaving it up when i shoot and then lowering it when i'm on the drive?) It then occured to me that this argument has missed the most important factor of the debate, the women!

Reply #291190 | Report this post


SRT070  
Years ago

regarding your second point prisoner of gravity, what do you mean the argument has missed the most important factor which is the women? i thought it covered it pretty well. it doesnt appear to be FIBA trying to do something out of thin air, it sounds like it has been raised over meetings with players coaches and officials, which includes the women, unless you mean something else which im missing?

Reply #291191 | Report this post


Laurie  
Years ago

"Look at that hot chick dunk?"
"Dude the ring is lowered, she can't really dunk."
"But she looks smoking hot in that bikini."

Reply #291194 | Report this post


SRT070. Sorry. I was referring to the debate on this post. Little to no of the arguments seem centred on whether the women wanted it or not. As i said earlier I actually enjoy both the womens and mens games as they are. If FIBA have decided that a majority of women favour the change, so be it. Personally, I don't know of any who have been consulted and every female basketballer I have spoken to seem a bit bemused by the idea. Don't know, maybe i need to get out more!

Reply #291230 | Report this post


SRT070  
Years ago

yeh good point, one thing is for sure though, and thats even though some of the women will be for it there will be some opposed it to. there is no pleasing everyone.

Reply #291257 | Report this post


Camel 31  
Years ago

Would be interesting what the girls (Stirling Cambage and the like) think about it .
I seem to recall (playing at St Clair one nite about 40 years ago) - the talk was about a news item from the USA - whereby Men run down and shoot a goal in a matter of seconds run down the other end for a goal and back agen. Too easy and the game would be better if the rims were shifted to 12feet.

Reply #291264 | Report this post


Peter  
Years ago

Ineedmore - the reason Dr Naismith nailed the peach baskets up high was to remove height as an advantage from the game (see Camel 31's post above). The reason we're where we are today has more to do with the other good doctor - Dr J - and David Stern's understanding of the entertainment industry.

And Prisoner of Gravity - I think you mean "favours" height and jumping ability, rather than "fosters" it. You should add netball to your list. The interesting thing about that is that tall players seem not to have become as dominant as in basketball. Presumably that is because there are really only 2 positions on the court where height can be a dominant advantage (GS and GK). However, I find that netball is a very entertaining sport to watch. At the top level, the athleticism is a match for men's basketball, the passing is often better (it's more important as players can't hold the ball and can't move with the ball), and court movement is quicker - of players and the ball.

However, it doesn't attract the same viewing audiences as men's basketball. Somehow, I don't think the reasons for that are related to the entertainment value of the product. I'm pretty sure lowering the ring and allowing dunking would change that. So what makes people think it would change it for women's basketball (see Laurie's post above)?

Reply #291272 | Report this post


LC  
Years ago

Opals legends Robyn Maher and Michelle Timms, current Opal Liz Cambage, and Larry Sengstock have voiced their opinion, and have slammed the idea of lowering the rings...

Link: http://linky.com.au/cnu04

From the article:

Timms described the rings suggestion as "absolutely outrageous."

"I just find that ridiculous," Timms said. "I don't find any merit in that at all. I just feel like decisions are being made and possibly, in this case, by men, that just aren't going to be good for the game. It's not going to make it a better spectacle. I think our game is wonderful and it is different from the men's game because it's not so aerial. Ours is more of a technical game and I don't know why they want to (change) that."

Bulleen and Opals player Liz Cambage, who tops 203 centimetres, said it would be a "ridiculous" and unnecessary decision to lower the ring height. "I've just finally learnt to slam dunk so if they lower the rings that would have been a lot of hard work wasted."

Larry Sengstock, chief executive of Basketball Australia, which governs both the men's and women's game, and who attended the conference also questioned the need for the change. "It didn't get a lot of support."

Reply #291606 | Report this post


Camel 31  
Years ago

Lizzy says it - so it must be so.

I'm not a big fan of players getting dragged around by the singlet, thereby getting called for travel and the like - either.

Reply #291617 | Report this post


Wam Soosnam  
Years ago

I just read this article which summarises the pathetic attempt by Fiba at the World Champs!


http://sports.espn.go.com/oly/columns/story?columnist=voepel_mechelle&id=5662243

Reply #292045 | Report this post




You need to be a registered user to post from this location. Register here.



Close ads
Little Streaks - The fun and interactive good-habits app designed especially for kids.
Serio: Tourism photography and videography

Advertise on Hoops to a very focused, local and sports-keen audience. Email for rates and options.

Recent Posts



.


An Australian basketball forum covering NBL, WNBL, ABL, Juniors plus NBA, WNBA, NZ, Europe, etc | Forum time is: 2:14 am, Sat 30 Mar 2024 | Posts: 968,026 | Last 7 days: 754