An Australian basketball forum covering NBL, WNBL, ABL, Juniors plus NBA, WNBA, NZ, Europe, etc | Forum time is: 6:41 am, Sat 20 Dec 2014 | Posts: 528,294 | Last 7 days: 847

Dunk Basketball Uniforms   Plus 2 Clothing is an Australian owned and operated street-wear specialist. Tall clothing designed by tall people.

Isaac
Last year

#30435

Tigers vs Kings, Jan 6

Game is on TV in Adelaide from 2pm.

Report this topic


 

Anonymous
Last year
15:31 6 Jan 13

Reply #396666

re: Tigers vs Kings, Jan 6

On channel TEN. Awesome game!


Report this post



CR
Last year
15:43 6 Jan 13

Reply #396670

re: Tigers vs Kings, Jan 6

Cracking game that ...

Tight down to the wire, both teams gave it their best shot, someone had to win.

Well done to the Tigers for hanging on ... in the end, Sydney may have been a bit stiff but that's how close games go.


Report this post



anomn
Last year
15:45 6 Jan 13

Reply #396671

re: Tigers vs Kings, Jan 6

i was at the game how did madgen not get T'd up when he threw a chair at the ref hahahh


Report this post



Ingles13
Last year
15:48 6 Jan 13

Reply #396673

re: Tigers vs Kings, Jan 6

yeah that chair incident with no action taken surprised me.


Report this post



paul
Last year
15:51 6 Jan 13

Reply #396676

re: Tigers vs Kings, Jan 6

What a fantastic game! Good result too, keeps the finals race open for a little bit longer at least.


Report this post



Bucketman
Last year
15:53 6 Jan 13

Reply #396678

re: Tigers vs Kings, Jan 6

Great to see two team playing with the passion to win, instead to trying not to lose. Well played and coached.


Report this post



KingJames
Last year
16:02 6 Jan 13

Reply #396682

re: Tigers vs Kings, Jan 6

The Madgen incident was a ridiculous non tech foul!

Also can anyone explain to me WHY Scott fouled straight away when they are up 5 with 8 seconds to go? I don't want to bring up conspiracies but does anyone know what the line was for this game? I didn't bet on this game but that play was just bizarre. Does anyone have a reasonable explanation as to why he did it?


Report this post



anomn
Last year
16:04 6 Jan 13

Reply #396683

re: Tigers vs Kings, Jan 6

cos garlepp is a terrible free throw shooter


Report this post



Jez
Last year
16:06 6 Jan 13

Reply #396686

re: Tigers vs Kings, Jan 6

Maybe it's just me but Owen Odigie seems to get a lot of camera time on Ten/One in the pre-game warm-ups for a development player ... I daresay the cameraman isn't aware who he is and has made a pretty lazy assumption ...


Report this post



anon
Last year
16:11 6 Jan 13

Reply #396688

re: Tigers vs Kings, Jan 6

hey Marty thats what a team that is 100% behind the coach plays with passion and guts, by the way Ansty is by far a better coach at least he has plays his team understands.What a great game Balls and Bruce ex 6ers l believe Marty ??


Report this post



Marcus Camby
Last year
16:11 6 Jan 13

Reply #396689

re: Tigers vs Kings, Jan 6

@KingJames...

Going off memory, the line was +/-3.5.

So unfortunately, the FTs may have 'crossed' the Line.


Report this post



Anonymous
Last year
17:40 6 Jan 13

Reply #396724

re: Tigers vs Kings, Jan 6

Jez,

The cameramen/director don't have a clue. In the intros for the 36ers/Crocs game the commentators were talking about the new import (SC) and the One camera guys were zooming in on Gibson the whole time and then right at the end of the convo switched to SC.


Report this post



Isaac
Last year
17:51 6 Jan 13

Reply #396732

re: Tigers vs Kings, Jan 6

Wouldn't Scott fouling deprive the Kings of the chance at a three?


Report this post



hoopie
Last year
22:00 6 Jan 13

Reply #396806

re: Tigers vs Kings, Jan 6

Pretty exciting game but spoilt by a lot of no-calls which frustrated the heck out of me.

The refs must have been told to let the game flow, and luckily it didn't get as far as blood flowing as well.

WWE should watch this game cos they might get some useful ideas.


Report this post



DJ
Last year
07:53 7 Jan 13

Reply #396843

re: Tigers vs Kings, Jan 6

Went to the game - Anstey instructed Scott to foul - Scott didnt agree (they had a few sec animated about it) but Scott complied and it paid off.


Report this post



paul
Last year
08:30 7 Jan 13

Reply #396854

re: Tigers vs Kings, Jan 6

I thought the reffing was pretty spot on in this game. A no-call is a good call if the defender has position.


Report this post



Anonymous
Last year
11:58 7 Jan 13

Reply #396930

re: Tigers vs Kings, Jan 6

I think the refs ruined their performance in the last 3 minutes. The two offensive fouls were soft at BEST. Madgen gives the smallest of push-offs and Goulding sends himself back 18 feet clearly flopping. Then the second on Flynn there was minimal contact and Madgen put himself to the floor. The no-call on the chair incident is obvious. Also, on the play where Bruce hit's the hail mary 3 Madgen's arm gets grabbed before the ball is in-bounded and nearly pulls him off balance and to the floor. Would have should have been a USF as inside the last 2 mins and the clock was stopped. There were a few others that escape me but i thought...WTF. So in my book not the greatest "spot-on" game by the refs.


Report this post



hoopie
Last year
12:41 7 Jan 13

Reply #396960

re: Tigers vs Kings, Jan 6

Paul, the one that really got up my nose was early on and caught beautifully by the replay. Lazare shoved someone (can't remember who) in good rebounding position by the basket about 2 metres sideways and nothing got called.
After that, there were so many grabs and bumps and hits that I thought I was watching E-grade AFL.

No wonder Garlepp was so surprised when he got called for the deliberate hip and shoulder.

The refs seemed to follow the principle that if the play could continue then they wouldn't call anything.


Report this post



Anonymous
Last year
14:32 7 Jan 13

Reply #397014

re: Tigers vs Kings, Jan 6

Rohan Short quit the Tigers?


Report this post



Anonymous
Last year
14:36 7 Jan 13

Reply #397019

re: Tigers vs Kings, Jan 6

The Scott "foul" in the last 14 secs should have been an USF, no intent for the ball, basically grabbed him around the waiste. 2 and possesion might have changed things as bit.


Report this post





 

Reply to this topic

Name Email

Random name suggestion for anonymous posters: Mimas 82

Title
Rules: You must read the Terms of Use. No spam, no offensive material, no sniping at other clubs, no 'who cares?'-type comments, no naming or bashing under 18 players.
Message

Please proof-read your post before submitting as you will not be able to edit it afterwards.
 


94Fifty
Goalrilla basketball hoops
Dennis Rodman - Raw and uncensored

Recent Posts

.
.