Gallo
Years ago

The Case for Pro/Rel in div 2

Have been going through the results from the weekend, and have noticed a lot of strong results by div 3 teams (in U12/14s) and 2nd div 2 teams (in 16s & 18s). Which got me thinking about the current "one team per club" policy being rolled out by BSA.

To me it seems like clubs are incapable of appropriately grading their teams. If there's a team in div 2 whose closest game (for 13th spot) is 30 points, and whose two pool games are over 50, they are in the wrong grade. When teams from div 3 come 5th & 6th, they are also in the wrong grade.

So what is being achieved by allowing these clubs to have automatic entry into div 2? Surely the outcome will be those getting belted every week are likely to quit, and those toiling away in the 3s who are good enough for 2s, are also more likely to quit.

If the clubs are incapable of grading their teams appropriately, BSA should take control (as they have from div 3-5) and allow the teams to grade themselves with summer season pro/rel.

Even just allowing the teams which came 5th & 6th into division 2 & dropping the bottom two sides, would make the entire competition considerably more competitive. And this would also strengthen the div 1 comp in years to come, by allowing more bottom age kids the opportunity to compete at div 2 level, rather than having top ages take the majority of div 2 spots, and then asking the bottom ages to go from div 3 to div 1.

What are the drawbacks to extending pro/rel to div 2 (not div 1, just div 2-5)? I really think it'd enhance the quality of competition, and if clubs are that hell bent on having teams in both div 1 & 2, they'll ensure they have enough quality kids & coaching that their div 2s qualify.

List of div 3 and/or 2nd div 2 teams over the weekend:

U12 Div 2 Boys: Southern 5th, Sturt 6th, Forestville 10th (13 team comp)

U14 Div 2 Boys: Norwood 9th, Forestville 10th, Sturt 13th, South 14th (14 team comp)

U16 Div 2 Boys: Sturt 3rd, Norwood 6th, North 9th, Sturt (4th team), 12th (13 team comp)

U18 Div 2 Boys: Forestville 4th, Sturt 5th, Norwood 8th, Forestville (4th team) 12th (13 team comp)

U12 div 2 girls: Forestville 5th, Sturt 6th (11 team comp)

U14 div 2 girls: Forestville 6th, Forestville (4th team) 11th (11 team comp)

U16 div 2 girls: Forestville 5th, Sturt 7th/8th (12 team comp)

U18 div 2 girls: Norwood 8th (8 team comp)

Topic #28271 | Report this topic


Not the solution  
Years ago

pro/rel in summer is hopeless. Trying to grade kids and win games is not a solution.

I would go one team per div in summer and have the top two teams play off against bottom 2 teams in each div above to decide winter. Eg Div 2 top 2 play div 1 bottom 2. for every division. Top 2 go up bottom 2 go down. that way teams would be graded correctly to talent level for summer. Watch the clubs grade players then as there is a massive incentive to do well.

The issue also is kids develop at different rates so there will be massive gains by kids new to the sport from summer to winter.

If you look at your club now could probably drop 2 or 3 from div 1 could be replaced with kids who have improved dramatically from div 2 or 3. It doesn't happen as coaches don't want to upset parents and players.

Reply #361691 | Report this post


Anon  
Years ago

never never never

Reply #361706 | Report this post


The solution  
Years ago

Looking at the above results I guess it depends on what the goals is for an elite comeptition.

In the past it seems that the philosophy is for every club to have a chance for div 1 and 2. But the idea that playres will move to make up numbers in weaker team seems to actually be counter productive, in that weaker teams seem to disappear altogether rather than gain players.

I would think that high level, even standard competition would be the goal. As such I would think that 8 team competitions with 21 rounds would work better. Giving teams and clubs an opportunity to aim for something each year.

1/ Have the bottom 2 teams from div 1 move down into div 2 after summer. Leaving an 8 team div 1 competition. Call it Championship grade.

2/ Have pro/rel in div 2 and below. This would mean the top 6 div 2/3 teams would play the bottom 2 div 1 teams which should make for a very strong competition. At the end of the 3 rounds of summer pro/rel. Top 2 in the second group plays the bottom 2 in the first group for the final spots in this grade. Call it Div 1.

3/ Have 8 team competition all the way through. This means that there will be a closer standard all the way down through the grades with less blow outs by the top teams in any grade against the bottom teams.

4/ Allow players to move up teams between seasons and grading phases like now.

Example 12 Boys.

Centrals and West would move down into div 2 which would be

West 1
Centrals 1
Sturt 2
Forestville 2
Centrals 2
Southern 2
Southern 3
Sturt 2

Then div 3 would be the next best 8 teams.

Reply #361708 | Report this post


old timer  
Years ago

pro/rel should be in across the board.

look at centrals and woodville's results in u16 girls reserves.

those kids will be out of basketball in 12 months - after being thumped like that - clearly they need to be in div 3.

best 10 teams in div 1 next best in div 2 and next in div 3 etc.

players and clubs then get a sense of achievement through working their way up through grades.

not like this expectation therefore it must be mentality that exists nowadays.

Reply #361712 | Report this post


old timer  
Years ago

the one club per team is dead in the water - look at u12s - got down to about 6 clubs - if forestville and sturt did not enter a second team - it would have been a very deja vu season.

Reply #361713 | Report this post


A Coach  
Years ago

Bring it on

Reply #361721 | Report this post


Anonymous  
Years ago

Something is not right in U12's. How can Centrals and North have teams in Div 4 with no losses with % in excess of 400% and in Div 3 we have a winless second Forestville team on 30 something % and a winless South team on 50 something %.

Is there really that big a gap between Div 3 and Div 4??

Reply #361722 | Report this post


annon  
Years ago

If there is to be a pro/rel set up, then I would suggest that we move away from this North/South competetion which appears nobody likes and run a true pro/rel divisions where we play all teams in the competetion.

Reply #361725 | Report this post


old timer  
Years ago

well - this all can change now - as the last draw will be out over the next few days.

some teams can get better or worse and often there is not much between div 3 and 4.

clubs need to get real and nominate their players in the right grades - yes some will step up - and the majority will fold if they get thumped week in week out - we need to keep players in the game and driving across town to keep a % of 20-30 over a season is not good for the confidence.

having been involved in clubs that have earnt their success coming from humble origins - you get a greater sense of achievement earning your stripes.

Reply #361727 | Report this post


humphrey  
Years ago

yes - there is not enough teams for the north / south arrangement

Reply #361728 | Report this post


Anonymous  
Years ago

I think it more likely comes down to good coaching. You need to ensure each region throughout the metropolitan area is represented, generally speaking across the competition. This may mean uneveness in some cases. However, this doesn't mean it is not an elite competition. Throughout the world elite BASKETBALL competitions are based around regional representation rather than promotion relegation. I mean do we tell NT, ACT or TAS they can't compete in Nationals because they are not up to standard. No the idea of elite competition is to give a pathway to participants within a region, test your region against again the best and then go back and improve from that.

Ultimately, developments comes down to good coaching, regardless of how much the teams wins or looses by week to week. I can give you examples of team that were pumped in Div 1 U12/U14s that went onto be very successful by U18s and included players that even went overseas to play on US College Scholarships, play ABL etc.

Already in lower division we see teams in summer get relegated but pumping teams in winter due to new players coming in or good coaching developing the players over summer at a faster rate.

Also periodisation dictates that coaches should focus on different skills and fundamentals over summer which may be at the sacrafice of winning in the short term.

Pro/Rel would loose more players from our sport than it would retain.

Reply #361729 | Report this post


humphrey  
Years ago

NT - TAS - ACT in nationals is an entirely different thing - once in a lifetime stuff for some players and families.

this is week in week out stuff - commonsense please.

Reply #361733 | Report this post


Team player  
Years ago

Anon 729 please give your examples of pumped 12/14 teams that were successful by 18s and the coaches that turned these teams around

Reply #361739 | Report this post


Vesta  
Years ago

And I will include the kids that they recruited into these teams to make them improve.

PS Pro/rel wont stop that.

Reply #361762 | Report this post


Anthony  
Years ago

Some of the issues raised here particularly in the under 12's is due to lodgement/acceptance by both the clubs and bsa. I do know the top two sides in div 4 should have been in div 3 according to the clubs. They were put in div 4 due to the late entry by the clubs and the only available spots were in div 4. Both North and Lions top div 4 teams were supposedly to be in Div 3 according to the clubs representatives but if bsa put them in div 4 then thats where they play. In this instance promotion/relegation would work as it is clear those two teams are too strong for Div 4.

Reply #361770 | Report this post


Anonymous  
Years ago

I am aware of one club and they were not late in nominating their teams!

Reply #361782 | Report this post


anon  
Years ago

Start the winter season with a pre-season Div 1 and Div 2 Championship grading competition over 2-3 weeks. Then depending on the position split the 20-22 teams into 2 groups and start the winter season.

Everyone then has a chance of good competition every week. Teams in Div 1 and 2 would get a " reality check" about where they belong in the competition.

Reply #361785 | Report this post


The Solution  
Years ago

anon,

What if you dont get the right 20 - 22 teams in the first place? Or team 23 is better than team team 15?

While I for one am not against pro-rel across the board, giving clubs the chance to start in the top division and earn their spot, while having other teams div 2 and div 3 team do the same seems to make sence.

What we aare seeing is that the difference between the top teams in div 2 and the bottom teams is very large. And also, that the best teams in div 3 are significantly better than some div 2 teams.

The up shot is that this can postentially lead to kids leaving the sport for 1 reason or another which not only damages clubs, both stronger and weaker, but more importantly, damages the sport.

The sooner this is fixed, the better.

Reply #361793 | Report this post


anon  
Years ago

Good point "The Solution". We need a pre-winter season grading to place teams into appropriate Div 1,2 3 and beyond grades.

If as a club all your teams are in a lower grade, then ther is incentive to improve to avoid the embarassment. These kids are more likely to enjoy basketball if they don't get thumped every week.

Bring on Pro/Rel. The kids want it, the parents want it. What's the holdup ?

Reply #361920 | Report this post


Coach  
Years ago

If we want to get serious about creating a strong comp in SA then we need the best players/teams playing each other week in week out and if that means the stronger/larger clubs have two teams in div one and 3 in div to then so be it...
Take the U12 girls for an example.
In Div. 1 they only have 8 teams as Centrals and Woodville don't have a team. In this 8 team comp the Eagles are top with a 461% and South are bottom with 11% whilst in Div.2 the Eagles are top with 517%!! Sturt are 2nd 441% and even Sturt 2 (third team) have a 243%...!! Surely one or two of those Div.2 teams are stronger than the bottom 4-5 teams in Div.1?? Surely this is a better option then hoping players in div 3 will leave a strong club to play div 1-2 at a weaker club as this clearly hasn't happened... Ultimately i think Div. 1 should be for the best teams and the standard Div.3 style summer season pro/rel would determine who those best teams are...

Reply #362568 | Report this post




You need to be a registered user to post from this location. Register here.



Close ads
Serio: Tourism photography and videography
Little Streaks - The fun and interactive good-habits app designed especially for kids.

Advertise on Hoops to a very focused, local and sports-keen audience. Email for rates and options.

Recent Posts



.


An Australian basketball forum covering NBL, WNBL, ABL, Juniors plus NBA, WNBA, NZ, Europe, etc | Forum time is: 9:50 pm, Sat 7 Dec 2024 | Posts: 968,026 | Last 7 days: 754