No but the thoughts previously posted that the under 14 boys be dominated by forestville yet lost first two of three games and only win was against a very poor west team.

According to posts it was forestville first then Sturt and every one else a distant second.

Don't know enough myself to comment on whether it was a shock or not.

Reply #443387 | Report this post

Anonymous
Years ago

Forestville will beat both teams when they have their full side playing.

Reply #443407 | Report this post

Anonymous
Years ago

ahh..that old 'missing players' chestnut..never tire of it

Reply #443411 | Report this post

Anonymous
Years ago

They still desperately recruiting ^^ look out clubs

Reply #443416 | Report this post

Anonymous
Years ago

Funny Woodville we're missing 3 players didn't hear them making excuses they just won.

Reply #443426 | Report this post

Anonymous
Years ago

It's only summer and I'm sure team may have additions by winter.

I mean no one mentions eastern or centrals who were the best last season and started well this season. Without playing each other and seeing squads, how can you make a valid statement over who's gonna be better.

I just think its great for ball if the likes of centrals, eastern, Woodville etc can be considered on same page as the two elite teams.

Are forestville elite in boys? We know sturt dominated boys at state champs, but didn't eastern and centrals do just as well as forestville, if not better?

Reply #443467 | Report this post

Anonymous
Years ago

Centrals should probably be 2nd behind Forestville. Eastern, Sturt and Woodville all pretty even behind that. South will be alright too.
Most of all, it is a pretty deep competition this year, lots of teams could beat other teams on the day.

Reply #443518 | Report this post

Anonymous
Years ago

Forestville are strong in the girls but have never really been a powerful boys program, a lot of the claims are smoke and mirrors with this.

Reply #443522 | Report this post

Hoops

div 1 results

Recent Posts