So after (perhaps naively) thinking this was a great move by Sturt I have had a bit of a chat and a search online and am left with more questions than answers!
BballFan mentions his excellent CV which is also the impression I had after looking at his website and also from speaking to people at Sturt.
In his own words he was a "terrible player" and I know that your don't need to be a great player to be a great coach but surely some higher level experience helps? I'd imagine it may be hard for some players to relate to someone who has not played at a high level?
I can see he coached in Germany but in reality what level is German second division? Is it NBL1 level or much better?
He coached in NZ but the only info I can find about that is that it perhaps didn't end well?
There's plenty of articles about him being the next big thing without him ever really taking the next step to NBL level despite being available. I had seen him at 36ers games but was only really taking warm ups and not on the actual bench.
Onto North and he takes over as head of basketball or whatever the title was and also takes charge of the U18 boys team. That team brings back a big name player from the AIS and the team fails to even make the finals. He jets off overseas for a while (I assume paid by North while on holiday) and the team is taken over by a new coach who leads them to the winter season runner up! Quite a turnaround.
In his time at North there were a lot of players and families that left, maybe coincidentally, maybe not, however it is surely something any new employer might explore? Have Sturt done this? If not, why not?
I would take this to the Sturt board but I'm concerned as to what ramifications it may have for my kids given he's already clearly been signed up.
Do his actual real world coaching results justify the expensive curriculums, camps, pay for plays and other for profit activities or is it just a case of good marketing?