Re : #542498
There's a difference.
A large number of the older kids at Oakleigh, have been at other programs. I know because I've coached and cut some of them in previous years, and know other names from prior seasons.
Casey appear to be building things from the ground up. Yes they spent a bit of money on BigV, but that's what you need to do when your program hasn't yet generated the players needed to fill roster spots at that level. The BigV (or SEABL) team needs to be relatively strong as an aspirational target for younger athletes.
And BTW Oakleigh has one boys team in VC (18s) as does Casey (14s).
Want a comparison ? (Boys teams used) :
Oakleigh 20.1 - Met5
Casey 20.1 - Met1
Oakleigh 18.1 - VC
Casey 18.1 - Met1
Oakleigh 16.1 - VC Res
Casey 16.1 - Met3
Oakleigh 14.1 - Met4
Casey 14.1 - VC
Oakleigh 12.1 - Met2
Casey 12.1 - VC Res
So at the grassroots, Casey actually have a stronger platform, which should translate into 16s and 18s whereas Oakleigh may struggle in 2 years time, although not a big difference, each has one team in VC and one team in VC Reserve (Boys).
The reason I suggested Casey is that it's the least broken large program in the area, and the likelihood is that daughter will establish new friendships with kids also in the area, and training attendance won't be a chore or an onerous expense for the parents by having to travel further to say, Waverley or Sandringham or Dandenong on a Mon/Tues evening and/or Sunday morning.
I'm also going to repeat that I am not in any way affiliated with the Casey Cavaliers in any way etc etc.