"So that applies to gaze too, he only played a couple of games and was never NBA standard yet people keep calling australia's best. What a joke gaze is not even in the top 10 for australia."
Wow. Another dumb comment where context is thrown out the window. For one, people rarely refer to Andrew Gaze as an NBA player - despite him playing more NBA games than Creek and actually (somehow) having an NBA title. So there goes your whole comparison, and the whole premise of your comment. Mitch Creek is not an NBA player and is less of an NBA player than Andrew Gaze. You've proven my point already.
And then you say Andrew Gaze isn't even top 10 for Australia. Now this is harrowingly stupid. A guy who led the Olympics and World Cup in scoring basically every time he went out there and who routinely lit up top level Team USA teams by 25+ isn't in Australia's top 10? On what planet? Name 9 players who've performed better in a Boomers jersey?
And if you want to make the NBA the bridge you die on for that, the NBA weren't really interested in international players when Gaze was in his prime. You have guys like Arvydys Sabonis, clearly one of the greatest centers the world has ever seen, who didn't get into the NBA until his mid-30s when he was well past his prime. Aggressive recruitment of international players did not become much of a thing until the early 00s with Manu Ginobli, Yao Ming and Dirk Nowitzki. But you're going to act like everyone has always had equal shot at playing in the NBA, and act like because Andrew Gaze didn't have the privilege of being born in a time when the NBA was particularly open minded to international players, that that means he's somehow not as good?
Seriously, dude, you sound like a moron. You'd do yourself more favours not speaking. The fact that your name is "anonymous" doesn't mean that we're not piecing together the kind of numbskull you are.