This is pretty much expected based on one of the Perth podcasts with the NBL CEO a few months ago.
I don't see a problem with this. I’m anti-over saturation of sport in the sense of the Big Bash over did it a few years ago and the NBA is ridiculous with 82 games when it should be something closer to 60. A-league feels like it has gone too long and intrusive into the calendar.
But the NBL at 33 games is perfectly fine, the sweet spot is more than the 29 they previous had IMO. The actual length of the NBL season is pretty good, it’s short and sharp.
I suspect we will see teams like Perth use it as an opportunity for regional games without taking away from their normal 14 home games for members. A team like Adelaide perhaps uses it as an opportunity for an extra couple of games of revenue in a stadium that is consistently filled out.
I am pro-sports playing most days personally. I think the idea of Fri night to Sunday only is a dying concept.
For example, the AFL should be Thurs-Mon, even if Monday night is more of a TV game like at Marvel with plebby supported sides of North/Bulldogs/Saints. I’d rather that than 2 games playing simultaneously.
For summer sports, like the tennis and cricket and basketball, playing most days or every day is valid. It’s nicer weather, more sunlight, people are more interested in doing things and engaging with it opposed to bunkering down with Netflix.
The NBL should have games every day during the "festive period" between December through to end of January. Outside of that, play games regularly Wednesday-Sunday.
The festive period is a great opportunity to have a variety of home game demography catered for: weeknights for the corporates, weekend during the day for families, weekend nights for people that want a night out and go out to bars after.
If a team only plays 2/3 home games across 2 (or 3) weeks, we might see demographics not really have options across the prime “go out and do things” period.