A second WA team would be awesome. Play them out of Challenge stadium.

But I don't know about them being operated by an AFL club.

There are lots of Wildcats fans ready to jump ship.

"There are lots of Wildcats fans ready to jump ship"

What makes you say that? (Just curious)

I like the concept of football clubs being involved, since it would fit in nicely for their staff to have permanent year-round roles.
I don't know about another team in Perth though. The logistics of it worry me. I don't know that there's enough support to have 2 teams playing out of the expensive Perth Arena, but I also can't imagine any team or its fans wanting to go back to Challenge or whatever it's called these days.

Yep. Challenge Stadium is in the middle of nowhere. Definately wouldn't work for a second team

Perhaps a Victorian Country team would work?

It's not a bad idea. Again, I think LK is looking in the right direction. The only real complaint i've had during his era is the lack of transparency following the salary cap equity rule. That needs to be dealt with in some way as a matter of public confidence - keeping us in the dark is a problem even if they're actually doing it or found a system which has kept the NBL sides happy. I appreciate some or much of the information may be confidential, but it just needs to be approached in a way that informs the public in some way shape or form.

Anyway - save for the dilemma of diluting talent, I think it gets boring to be facing off against the same side multiple times within a few days or weeks. 12 sides remedies that.

He makes a good point: you want business acumen involved not hobby splash the cash. AFL/NRL sides have a benefit of sponsorship connections, members, top notch facilities and understanding the business of sports. They're also not in direct summer season competition.

He also is on a potentially good track in building cross town rivalry helps to increase a market, get the city more involved and improve the sports' reach into those core capital markets.

2018/19 a second Victorian team would be amazing, 2019/20 a NZ side and 2020/21 a Perth and Tassie or Canberra side. Introducing teams around and in the leadup to the Tokyo Olympics should be some decent momentum to piggyback.

Challenge Stadium is hardly in the middle of nowhere. What Challenge lacks in is modern amenities. Would be hard to get support for a 2nd Perth team if they play there. Plus the support would be thin as the Wildcats rule the West. Though I wouldnt say its impossible.

2nd teams in established markets is the way to go with Tasmania also included. There just isnt enough new markets to introduce new teams.

A 2nd Melbourne team - backed by an AFL club and a 2nd Sydney club - maybe backed by GWS - they back a netball team so why not an NBL club if there is interest.

A Western Sydney team would be viable i think.

Id be very wary of expanding too quickly and also diluting the quality.

While its a good plan for the league to generate expanion, by getting AFL clubs on board, there is one thing I absolutely hate about the idea.

The AFL will impose its branding and will have its footprints everywhere. To some effect it will be to the detriment of the NBL, which will lose some of its own character and identity if its too closely linked to the AFL. We already get annoyed at AFL commentators calling NBL games so this is just the beginning!

Ive been following the Suncorp Netball league closely and can see that happening in that league. It has way too much AFL and NRL focus. Its like the netball sold itself out just to become bigger overnight without doing so organically.

Challenge Stadium is hardly in the middle of nowhere.

More broadly the biggest issue I see is there is still lack of decent Australian talent. Add 2-3 more teams and it makes the quality of teams go down.

I think there's enough Aussie talent for 2 more teams without a visible drop in quality on the court. End of benches will get shorter, but not sure that's such a bad thing either with 40 min quarters.

If they based the team in Armadale they would certainly lead the league in steals!

Balga and girrawheen won't be far behind.

Best part is if it happens I'll see my beloved cats extra 4 times a year!

Tend to agree with the posts about talent not being as big a problem with a couple more teams.

A new team would have probably 3 imports, a returning Aussie/NZ college player (Mitch McCarron, McDowell-White type). Then they'd aim to poach a fringe starter from an existing club. That gives a reasonable starting 5 then it's about the first 2-3 bench spots and the coaching staff. So you end up with shorter benches. But this year, I get the sense we're seeing teams playing >90% of their minutes with their first 8 players, with the starting 5 playing ~70%-75% of the minutes. If that's right, there's room to shorten the bench to 9 plus 2 scrubbers rather than 10+1 at the moment, without a massive drop in the entertainment value.

It's worth remembering that the NBL was thriving in the 1990s with 13+ teams per year, albeit with 2-3 perennial easybeats. For entertainment value, the 1990s NBL was pretty good. That's why it did well. A big difference now is that a lot of good Aussies are playing overseas. Compensating for that, almost all of NZ's best players have been added to the league, along with an additional import per team. So we may have lost 4-5 teams' worth of talented Aussies but we've added a team's worth of NZ talent and room for another team's worth of imports.

Odd that they were omitted, yeah.
I think a new city makes more sense at this point than doubling up in Perth, Melb, Syd.
Provided the finances stack up, of course.
Wellington still seems the best next location to me.

Watto

An Armadale (West Oz) prison/JJ centre reference?

Or an aspersion on the fine students at Uni of New England?

I once stole the ball from Ernest Zigamazabo (spelling?) in JJ centre, and beat him in knockout. Ex NBL scrub vs ex junior scrub. I was just doing my job, not there by Magistrate's invitation.

The linkage between an AFL and another sporting code has started with the Netball. I remember an interview with Eddie commenting how he wants to make Collingwood the "Manchester United" of Australia, some already say it is the Arse nal.

But does AFL really want to promote a competitor to the netball and AFLW summer sports they already promote???

They may have an interest in gaining converts from basketball to AFL, but why would they support the opposition in their developing netball and AFLW markets?

Both of these sports/products are currently placed in the summer sports marketplace.

Wow, so LK yet again taking credit for ideas that have been around for years.
Had to laugh about his comment regrading "hobbyists." Pot, meet kettle.

But yes, for the record, I like the idea of football clubs getting involved. They already have the people and systems in place to handled marketing sponsorship, memberships, contracts, etc. Plus they're not going to fold at the first sign of trouble. I think in Melbourne there would be huge attraction for the inner-city clubs that are in a constant fight for new members.

As for a 2nd team in Perth, going for a Fremantle/SOR connection is the logical choice, but I wonder if there's enough intrinsic support there?

People suggesting a return to Challenge are either 12 years old, not actually from Perth, or just trolling.
The Wildcats moved to Challenge because they had no choice. The govt of the day bollocksed up the original deal to build the Arena, and the PEC was closed.

They would simply need to subsidize games at the Arena until their crowds grew sufficiently.
If they priced their memberships keenly, they should attract a few thousand family members because there are no decent seats left for Wildcats games.

An afl club being involved in Melbourne would be a disaster. If they think the fan base was splintered before, try getting fans of the other 9 Victorian teams to support a team backed by Collingwood

They both have fanbases big enough to support that.

Having a rivalry between the Perth Wildcats and West Coast Eagles, two iconic Perth clubs, not sure how it would work, not being from over there, but it sounds intriguing.

And if it was Collingwood in the NBL as the second Melbourne team, you'd all of a sudden have a lot more Melbourne United fans!

In an article from years back Nick Marvin said that Wildcats needed to have 11000 seats filled to pay for hire of Perth Arena each game, new team surely wouldn't do that regardless of who they call themselves.

This idea sounds like something St. George/Illawarra should take advantage of and try and get in early and be that club with affiliations and share sponsors that can be seen year round for heaps more than both clubs are being paid.

Sucks to be Tasmania, I want them in.

I've said on this site for years that I want Geelong FC to affiliate with the Supercars and use their training facilities and everything else at their disposal and that got shot down due to a tin shed of a stadium but Geelong FC have a very smart business plan, a loyal fan base, they won't take fans away from United in Melbourne and you know that initially that will please Larry.

What is the relationship like between the Cowboys and the Taipans, is it frosty due to reptile rumble battles or have they visited the same communities from time to time? Could they have some sort of affiliation considering Townsville won't even be thought of for a team again for atleast another 20 years (how long has it been for Newcastle and Canberra) and there are no A-League, cricket or union teams to compete with.

My biggest concern is poaching and we all know that AFL takes the best basketball juniors they can if they can influence them with what opportunities that sport offers. If they are that involved with an NBL team you just know that a star junior will appeal more to them as a potential AFL player than someone for their summer hobby.

Townsville and cairns are 4 hours away from each other so unlikely to be any benefit sharing staff facilities etc. Townsville croc o boys on the other hand!

Bendigo works well for a second Victorian team, does OK in the WNBL.

Tasmania should get a team, Canberra too, a second team in NZ would be good.

A second team in WA would have to be placed in either Mandurah or Bunbury I think.

It's stupid to have AFL team names as NBL team names. Netball has Collingwood Magpies, and Giants etc and it sucks.

Give unique names to NBL teams but can be backed by AFL teams.

Plus not all AFL fans are interested in basketball, or if they are most are just interested in NBA.

NBL teams backed by AFL teams has merit, but not sharing the same names/colours etc.

You sure Bendigo does well in the WNBL, Wilburs?

Ouch Luuuc, that pic is damning mate, I keep thinking that Bendigo needs a more up to date stadium and not a tin shed to warrant a team and as much as I love the great folk of Bendigo, if they aren't going to games then they aren't worthy of a team.

Canberra should be way ahead of that thinking, bring back the mighty Cannons

Tasmania,what a joke. The league punted the Crocs for having 2500 a night. Roo's v GWS couldn't get 4000 in Hobart to that game,no chance for an NBL team EVER!

I agree. You need to build a professional arena to get people to pay their money to be entertained.

9000 would be a pretty decent NBL crowd. And nobody in Tasmania really has any reason to care about either North Melbourne or GWS.

9000 would be a great NBL crowd.
What was the capacity of the Derwent centre ?