ok Isaac, I'll typed this very slowly for you...
My initial comment that you have taken exception to:
" But someone decided to put an ex-politician in charge, so what do you expect."
To any reader above the age of 12, this is clearly not a factual statement made by someone who understands or cares about the machinations that drives decision making at BA. Instead it is a characterisation of the issue at hand. I.e. "Politicians make crappy decisions and this is a really crappy decision".
The minutia of who was there, how this stupid decision was made, people in chains or any other tediously mind-numbing objection you want to make, is actually the irrelevancy that you so desperately seek.
See how you are irrelevant?
See how you are not on topic?
See how you Spot runs?
See how you write statements that belong in a kids book?
See how using open ended questions to make a conclusion is the work of a Clive Palmer voter.
See how I just called you a Clive Palmer voter, but that does not convey that you are actually a Clive Palmer voter. It just means, that I think you sound like someone who would vote for Clive Palmer.
I really hope this has been helpful. If I don't reply to your next post. It's because I have decided that it would be less painful to go out and headbutt traffic.