LHY
Two years ago

NBL1 Finals Structure

Apologies if this is in another thread but I went on the NBL1 website and couldn't find anything - how do the finals work in NBL1 South?

Topic #50153 | Report this topic

Anon
Two years ago

My understanding is top 8 as per AFL
Week 1
G1 1v4
G2 2v3
G3 5v8
G4 6v7

Week 2
G5 L1 v W3
G6 L2 v W4

Week 3
G7 W1 V W6
G8 W2 V W5

Week 4
W7 V W8

Reply #893619 | Report this post

Perthworld
Two years ago

Ewww lucky loser.

Is this layoff structure uniform amongst all NBL1 conferences?

Reply #893623 | Report this post

Perthworld
Two years ago

playoff*

Reply #893624 | Report this post

Pasadena 72
Two years ago

There's no "lucky loser" component to this Perthworld. Simply a double chance for top 4. The West league has the same structure.

An example of the lucky loser scenario is a top 6 format where the highest losing seed progresses after the first round, along with the three winning teams.

Reply #893632 | Report this post

Dunkman
Two years ago

The nbl1 east only has 12 teams, it's average as it is, surely not top eight.

Reply #893633 | Report this post

Dunkman
Two years ago

Same with nbl1 central, 10 teams only, and only slightly better than east.

Reply #893634 | Report this post

Anon
Two years ago

Each league will have their own finals structure.

Reply #893645 | Report this post

NBLTigers
Two years ago

NBL use to do lucky loser format when Wollongong Hawks their first title in 2001.

Reply #893646 | Report this post

Pasadena 72
Two years ago

Centrals is top 5.

Reply #893656 | Report this post

Perthworld
Two years ago

There's no "lucky loser" component to this Perthworld. Simply a double chance for top 4. The West league has the same structure.

An example of the lucky loser scenario is a top 6 format where the highest losing seed progresses after the first round, along with the three winning teams.

Okay my terminology was off but this system still involves losers in a playoff advancing which is a baffling thing we do here in Australia for whatever reason.

Reply #893679 | Report this post

koberulz
Two years ago

You can only lose one game. In the NBL system you can lose three.

Reply #893680 | Report this post

Ski 63
Two years ago

NBL1 North Final Series

Week 1 - Qtr Finals

1 vs 8
2 vs 7
3 vs 6
4 vs 5

Week 2 - Semi Finals

Highest finishing Winner vs Lowest finishing winner
2nd highest finishing winner vs and 2nd lowest finishing winner

Week 3 - Grand Finals (3 Games)
Highest finishing winner vs lowest finishing winner

Reply #893683 | Report this post

Perthworld
Two years ago

You can only lose one game. In the NBL system you can lose three.

You're conflating individual games with those which belong to a series.

When you're in a playoff and you can lose at one juncture and still qualify beyond that point by losing it defeats the purpose of the whole thing in the first place.

Reply #893686 | Report this post

Pasadena 72
Two years ago

I disagree. Having a second chance is a fair reward for a higher seeding. "Lucky loser" whereby your progression relies on certain other teams to lose as well makes little sense to me.

For what it's worth, Central have the same thing with their 5 team playoff.

Reply #893692 | Report this post

koberulz
Two years ago

Why does it matter whether you lose during a series or not?

Even with E second chance the current system is poor. Far prefer series.

Reply #893698 | Report this post

Perthworld
Two years ago

As the point is to win a series, not every game of it. Losing and still qualifying to the next phase defeats the do-or-die nature of playoffs.

Yes, a series format would be far superior.

Reply #893703 | Report this post

Hoops

NBL1 Finals Structure

Recent Posts