Trimble or Long biggest loser?
Early in the season Melbourne United coach Dean Vickerman basically said that Melo Trimble and Sean Long are a couple of losers that both come from losing programs last year and that neither of them know how to win basketball games. Chris Anstey pretty much said the same thing the other night. And then last night Vickerman essentially called both of them losers again when he was saying that Prather was on the team to close out games and that MU would have a better record if he was healthy - which was Vickermans way of saying that Long and Trimble cannot close out games because they are a couple of losers.
Now not a huge fan of Dean Vickerman but I have to admit that I do fully agree with him when he says that Long and Trimble are both losers.
With Melbourne United at 1-4 to start the season I think that we can all agree with Vickerman that Trimble and Long are a couple of losers when we consider the fact that they were both on losing teams last year but who is the biggest loser - Trimble or Long?
Long is a bit foul prone and can make some poor decisions in the clutch but Trimble is a point guard and its up to him to run the team. Trimble's game management is utterly atrocious and his two turnovers towards the end of the fourth quarter last night in Cairns are proof positive so I'm going to have to go with Trimble for biggest loser.
So what do you guys think? Do you agree with Dean Vickerman that his two new imports are a couple of losers? And if so then which one is the biggest loser - Long or Trimble?