the First Team always has a snub ALWAYS. Mainly due to the fact that its generally the 5 best players in the comp, so those guys slide up a position and usually leave a C or PF out of the mix. This year, the sacrificial lamb was Joker.
The Brad Beal snumb is pretty controversial. I mean, I love what CP3 has done with the Thunder and respect how hes gone about playing a part in helping the youngsters grow, whilst also still competing. but if were choosing a guy who averages something like 18-5-7 to be All-NBA because of the "hes won more games" over guys like Brad Beal (30-4-6 a night) or Trae Young (29-4-9), why was Kyle Lowry, who is posting 19-5-7.5 on a winning team not in, in place of Paul, given Toronto won more games and his stats are better than Paul's.
As said, I'm not knocking Paul or his skillset, im just struggling to find any consistency in how the voters think when they put the teams together.
Thoughts?