I don't think he’s as bad as everything thinks - it’s all good to say yea let’s get rid of him, it’ll free up money etc etc.
What if there’s nobody better to sign?
It’s kind of like DJ - all well and good to say on ya bike, but what big Aussie options are there?
36ers should try to make it really work.
McCarron had to spend an inordinate amount of time trying to glue shit together - the team was useless defensively where they could neither stick to players nor give too much space. MM was having to switch and run around covering up issues.
Because the other teams’ defence was always set (because they scored too easily against our crap defence), 36ers ended up being much slower or stifled than they were ever designed to be.
This resulted in a lot of iso that MM couldn’t do anything about.
If players weren’t going to move the ball. What was he going to do? Not pass the ball to all the "stars" playing iso or jacking up shit?
I would have thought MMs place in a team would be that Gibson style player with a point guard that’s like Ervin, with a team that defensively has it together down low so that he can stick to and stifle good players with his defence.
On offence, being able to grab the turnover or rebound and run, push forward, initiate ball movement, and with that take advantage of open shots with momentum and in transition (where he can score).
None of that is how the 36ers played last 2 years.
At what point do we go “maybe the 36ers suck at utilising players”, because there’s a fair few going around the NBL that play better as ex-36ers opposed to as 36ers.
So we let MM go and fail to utilise whomever replaces him?
Does that ensue shrieks of “36ers overpaid” all while pretending 36ers wouldn’t need to overpay known quantity stars to take them away from a place like Melbourne?